1) Dare I or dare I not?
The question is: Should I review a show that contains my family members? I have two members of my immediate family who are in Wheaton Drama's upcoming production of The Drowsy Chaperone. It seems tricky, and I sense a trap from which I may never escape. I'd like to hear what the public thinks.
2) Letters...we get letters...and comments...
In the comments section of the previous posting in which I announced with good intentions that I would post the review this past Saturday, I found the following questions/statements that I would like to acknowledge:
A) Your seem to have some geographic boundaries to where you will go to to view a show. Possibly you be more specific about your travel limitations.
I don't have travel restrictions, except for that annoying "do not fly" list that holds me up on border crossings. Perhaps I should drop ShoeBomber from my name. Anyway, I do take into account travel time when I choose a show to see. Don't you? I don't work for a paper or a media organization, so all the expenses of this venture fall on me. The shows I choose to review are usually ones I'm interested in seeing as a theatre patron. I know about them because their attempts at public relations were successful in reaching me. Or I have been invited to come and review the show. I live in Carol Stream, so that is the hub from which I radiate. This would explain seeing many shows in St. Charles, Wheaton, Glen Ellyn, Batavia, Geneva, Aurora, and Itasca. But I have also reviewed shows in Highland Park, Bolingbrook, and 3 different neighborhoods in Chicago. And now a show in Joliet. That was a long trip. But they invited me, and having never seen Drood before, my curiosity was piqued. I just received an invitation to review The Desk Set at Albright Theatre in Batavia. I said yes because I'm a fan of the Tracy/Hepburn movie of the same name, and I've never seen it as a stage production. If you have a specific show you'd like me to review, just let me know and if it's something I want to see, and if it fits in my schedule, I'll try to be there. I have learned that shows of only 2-weekend runs must stay off my radar for reviewing. By their nature there is pressure inherent to the process to meet a practical deadline. It gives me the willies.
B) What Saturday are you going to be posting your DROOD review? I would like to read it before I spend $13 on a ticket...
I laughed when I read this because as I realized I was going to miss my self-imposed deadline, I thought, "Well, I never did say which Saturday." This also gave my ego a boost, knowing that my opinion could actually hold sway over the fate of $13. Thank you for that power. The review is below. (hint...save your cash)
C) Kind of hard to take you seriously as a reviewer if you don't even post a review when you say you will.
I'm sorry you feel that way. I had the best intentions of getting the review posted Saturday. There are days when I don't feel like writing, or thinking about theatre or seeing a show. And that's OK. I'm entitled. We're all entitled. When it stops being fun, it's time to step back. When it starts to feel that way all the time, then it's time to close down the blog. If I start writing a review, or go see a show feeling pressured to do so, I won't be happy with the review or being at that show. Such was the case this weekend. My reviews don't go public until I'm happy with them and I think I'm giving you something worthy of your time. They are my creations...like children, and not many births take place on the projected due date. Too many damn variables. If because of that you think less of my critical skills, I'm sorry. Sadly, I will always disappoint you. As for you taking me seriously, I don't believe I ever entered into that accord with anyone, or you in particular. I just post. It's up to you to decide how it fits into your world and into your life.
D) Geez, give the guy a break! Things happen
Thanks Mom. Love you!
E) I saw Drood and I liked it. It was the first time I was able to yell at the actors and not worry abouut being asked to leave the theater! Heck, they encourage people to interact with the actors. Bill's review may or may not agree, but I thought it was a lot of fun.
As good a time as any to get into the review.
******************************************
The Chairman (Damon Sloan) and Edwin Drood (Natalie Gustafson) |
This production had all the minimalist trappings for this style of show and was in a wonderful venue. And if you buy the concept, you buy the show. But it is also a musical, and I expected people to be on key and display some panache for dance. If you are asked to believe it takes place in an English music hall, you should expect a certain quality to the "musical" aspect of the show. Unfortunately, this was not the case.
Eric Sipe played the "villain," John Jasper, the choirmaster (who had a hard time finding his notes). He played everything with rage. He sang with rage. He shouted with rage. He walked with rage. Everything was loud rage, with no nuance or levels. He had nowhere to go with the character, and he really tried too hard. It was a conscious character choice, and it was off-putting. Vocally, he wandered all over the map, and I didn't enjoy his performance. I endured it.
He is smitten with one of his students who is engaged to his nephew Drood. Her name is Rosa Bud, and she is presented by Annie Roach. Her performance was lackluster and dull, and made it difficult for me to feel anything for her character. She also had trouble finding or staying on key, and as the soprano, she fought valiantly to reach the higher notes. And, as an audience member, we could hear every punch landed as she fought her way to the top. She had a body microphone that amplified everything with distortion, making it harsh and hard to listen to. When she spoke, she was also amplified and seemed other-worldly. She and Jasper had a couple of duets. I endured them. As for the rest of the cast, except for two others, there was nothing memorable. The show music is a bit like Sondheim, so I wasn't sure if the dissonance was as written or due to poorly executed harmonies. I have since listened to a few of the songs off the original cast recording. Unfortunately, it was the execution.
The two actors who stood-out for me were Damon Sloan as The Chairman and Natalie Gustafson as Edwin Drood. Sloan captured the essence of an emcee. He developed great rapport with the audience. He was spontaneous, charming, amusing, and delightfully silly when he was forced into playing auxiliary characters. He has a wonderful stage presence and I hope to see him in other productions.
Natalie Gustafson found the marrow of the lead boy concept. Her attitude and manner were perfect for Edwin Drood. He/she was fun to watch, seemed invested in her character, and had a nice singing voice. Of particular note is the song, "A Private Investigation." Her voice was clear and filled the room without amplification. It was a highlight. She had a few moments struggling with harmonies in other songs, but that appeared to be a problem with her partners. She is also someone I look forward to seeing in other works. My only suggestion is that she work on hugging more like a man. Her embraces with Rosa seemed dainty...a little too kiss-kiss, hug-hug.
As a music hall/musical, this production failed on the dance front. There was nothing exciting. All the moves were simple, and simple was not done well. The band was OK, but very loud in that venue. Music cues were sloppy, and someone should teach the actors and the band how to talk-up a song over a long intro. I find it disturbing to watch an actor wait for his/her entrance into a song.
I will say that I enjoyed the "gimmick" of booing and hissing at the villain and cheering on the heroes. The voting for the ending was fun. I just wish the whole show had been better.
In the interest in full disclosure, I did receive a complimentary ticket to see the show. I didn't realize that's what it was until I arrived at the theatre. I have felt uneasy about it, since I won't take comps for shows I'm planning on reviewing, and I should have paid right then. It violates one of the core concepts of the blog, and I really feel I did myself a disservice. All last week, I could hear the heart beating beneath the floorboards. An invite to see a show with a comp ticket so I can have a second look after the review is published is OK, as I did when I saw Tommy again. It gave me an opportunity to talk with the director and discuss some of what he went through. I'm doing it this weekend for the closing of Equus. The director has invited me back to see the show and have an opportunity to speak with him Hey, why not? The upshot is this: I have mailed $11 to Joliet Drama League (they have a 55+ senior rate) earlier today before I posted this review. Then I can answer my signature question with honesty: Is it worth the price of admission? No, I don't think so.
Run time: 2 hours, 52 minutes, with intermission.
For tickets and times and more information, go here.